| |
The Case of John Roland Darsee
John Darsee
- 33 years old
- Fellow in the lab of Eugene Braunwald at Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Univ.
- In 1981 already published over 100 papers and abstracts while at Harvard and at Emory
- Offered a faculty position at Harvard
- Braunwald considered him the most remarkable of the 130 fellows who had passed through the lab
- Braunwald was considering setting up a lab for Darsee at Beth Israel Hospital
- He was a shining star in the field of drugs and other interventions that aid recovery from heart attacks

Events in the case:
- Two fellows and a lab tech who worked with Darsee were suspicious of his accomplishments
- Over a period of time they deduced that the abstract he was preparing contained no actual research
- In May, 1981 they went to Dr. Robert Kloner, director of the lab, with their suspicions but no proof--Kloner was skeptical but he investigated anyway
- Kloner asked Darsee to show him the raw data for the abstract; Darsee said he would pull some together
- What he did instead was to go into the lab and make recordings from a single dog, charting them with dates and entries as if they were from several experiments, i.e., he made up the data while the fellows and
lab tech watched!
- Confronted, Darsee admitted to falsifying these data, but he denied any other wrong doing
- Darsee was stripped of his NIH fellowship, his faculty appointment was withdrawn, but he was allowed to work in the lab and continue publishing
- Braunwald and Kloner, after carefully going over all the data from other experiments, exonerated Darsee of further wrong doing
- In October, 1981, the NIH questioned some data submitted by Braunwald's lab as part of a multi-institutional study, a study Darsee had worked on--Harvard's data were at variance with all the other institutions'--investigation showed that Darsee had doctored them, too
- To shorten more recent history, 8 papers published while Darsee was at Emory have been retracted. 32 abstracts from Emory were found to have manipulated or invented data--coauthors on some of these
abstracts didn't even know their names were on the abstracts
- At Harvard 9 papers and 21 abstracts were withdrawn
- Darsee was debarred from NIH funding and sitting on advisory bodies for 10 years
- Further inquiry showed that Darsee falsified data while he was an undergraduate student at Notre Dame

The reasons for Darsee's infractions are not entirely clear.
- In one account he referred to the death of his father and his admiration for Braunwald.
- In another, he stated that although he had no recollection of falsifying data, he acknowledged the
review panel's establishment of the fact of falsification and his personal role.
- In yet another, he asked "forgiveness for whatever I have done wrong."
- In still another, he said, "I had too much to do, too little time to do it in, and was greatly fatigued
mentally and almost childlike emotionally. I had not taken a vacation, sick day, or even a day off from
work for six years."
- A letter to Braunwald said, "I had put myself on a track that I hoped would allow me to have a
wonderful academic job and I knew I had to work very hard for it."
|