The Nebraska Center for Rural Health Research

 
ENGINEERING A CULTURE OF SAFETY
• About • Toolbox Home • Tool Inventory • Medication Safety for Small Rural Hospitals • Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Resources •
Reporting Culture Just Culture Flexible Culture Learning Culture
Engineering Interaction Between the Components
INVENTORY

ENGAGE AND EDUCATE



Engineer a REPORTING Culture

Reporting Systems as the Foundation of Patient Safety Programs (Powerpoint)

DOWNLOAD

Objectives …
bullet Explain the role of voluntary reporting systems in a program of patient safety
bullet Identify the characteristics of successful reporting systems
bullet Identify information necessary for systematic data collection in a medication error reporting program
bullet Understand how the NCC MERP Taxonomy of error severity provides a language to describe errors in the context of a system
 
Process Map Template for Medication Administration (Excel)

DOWNLOAD

Creating a flowchart or process map makes your process or system visible and ensures that everybody has the same mental model of the system.

A process map will …
bullet Identify unexpected complexity and redundancy of steps
bullet Compare and contrast the current process with the evidence-based process from guidelines and identify priorities for change
bullet Identify needed areas for further data collection and prioritization of change
bullet Serve as a communication tool in training or a root cause analysis
 
To Map or Not to Map (Powerpoint)

DOWNLOAD

Objectives …
bullet List three benefits for documenting a process using a process map
bullet Identify barriers and gaps in a process
bullet Determine evidence-based practices to improve the process to eliminate failures
bullet Describe three tools for documenting processes
 
How to Develop a Process Map (Word)

DOWNLOAD

Process mapping allows you to identify productivity opportunities, best practices, root causes of problems, create workflow consistency, and determine who owns an action item within the process and who is accountable for the process.
 


Engineer a Just Culture

Patient Safety and the “Just Culture”: A Primer for Health Care Executives. Marx D. (2001) DOWNLOAD

Marx, D. (2001). Patient Safety and the “Just Culture”: A Primer for Health Care Executives.  Prepared for Columbia University under a grant provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

"To promote a culture in which we learn from our mistakes, organizations must re-evaluate just how their disciplinary system fits into the equation. Disciplining employees in response to honest mistakes does little to improve overall system safety. Yet, mishaps accompanied by intoxication or malicious behavior presents an obvious and valid objection to today’s call for blame-free error reporting systems."
 

Principles of a Fair and Just Culture - Patient Safety Rounds Toolkit LINK

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.  Principles of a Fair and Just Culture.  Patient Safety Rounds Toolkit.
Example of how one organization has operationalized "Just Culture".
 

The Just Culture Community Website LINK

This website provides a guide to building an open, fair, and just culture, and a guide to the management of three distinct classes of behavior. By registering to become a community member you can gain access to online training and an interactive form of the unsafe acts algorithm.
 


Engineer a FLEXIBLE Culture

Joint Commission Website - Sentinel Event Statistics LINK

For over a decade, communication has been the single greatest root cause of sentinel events reported to the Joint Commission. In 2006, leadership and procedural compliance were also among the top four root causes of sentinel events. Communication, leadership, and compliance with procedures reflect the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for healthcare providers to effectively function as teams.
 

TeamSTEPPS Overview LINK
As Carolyn Clancy, MD, Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality indicates, “Communication failures and lack of teamwork are major contributing factors to patient injury and harm. There is a growing body of evidence from military, civilian, transportation, and healthcare settings that confirms the fact that effective team skills can be developed.” TeamSTEPPS™ is an evidence-based teamwork system aimed at optimizing patient outcomes by improving communication and other teamwork skills among health care professionals. It includes a comprehensive set of ready-to-use materials and training curricula necessary to integrate teamwork principles successfully into your health care system. TeamSTEPPS™ was developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) in collaboration with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
 
Managing Disruptive Behavior as a Foundation for Teamwork DOWNLOAD
Disruptive behavior is any inappropriate behavior, confrontation, or conflict, ranging from verbal abuse to physical or sexual harassment. Disruptive behavior causes strong psychological and emotional feelings, which can adversely affect patient care (Rosenstein & O’Daniel, 2008). On July 9, 2008, The Joint Commission issued a Sentinel Event Alert regarding disruptive behavior: and stated that, “Intimidating and disruptive behaviors can foster medical errors, contribute to poor patient satisfaction and preventable adverse outcomes, increase the cost of care, and cause qualified clinicians, administrators and managers to seek new positions in more professional environments. Safety and quality of patient care is dependent on teamwork, communication, and a collaborative work environment. To assure quality and to promote a culture of safety, health care organizations must address the problem of behaviors that threaten the performance of the health care team.” http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_40.htm

To function as part of a team, individuals must feel valued and be treated with respect.

Alan Rosenstein, M.D., M.B.A., is Vice President and Medical Director, VHA West Coast. He is a nationally-recognized expert in the prevalence and management of disruptive behavior in healthcare. Michelle O’Daniel, M.H.A., M.S.G., is Director of Member Services at VHA. Dr. Rosenstein and Ms. O’Daniel have published extensively on the topic of disruptive behavior. Rosenstein and O’Daniel advocate a strategy to address disruptive behavior that includes: raising awareness through surveys, developing policies and procedures for reporting, and education. This education links disruptive behavior to adverse events and identifies structured teamwork and communication skills such as those in the TeamSTEPPS curriculum essential to managing disruptive behavior.
 


Engineer a LEARNING Culture

Learning disabilities can be fatal in organizations

 

Being a learning organization does not mean that senior leaders are eager to try each new idea that emerges from the literature, a workshop, or a consultant. Being a learning organization means:

bullet formal and informal safety reporting systems provide information about safety systems
bullet there is a just and straightforward way to decide if an event warrants disciplinary action
bullet structured communication in the context of teamwork ensures that an organization is flexible—authority gradients are not a barrier to effective communication
bullet the will exists to act—to execute and evaluate—the changes indicated by safety reporting systems
bullet a learning organization systematically makes sense of events that occur to achieve the goals of eliminating risks and hazards to patient safety and providing evidence-based reliable care
 
A simple fable helps learning organizations overcome resistance to change

LINK

Kotter J, Rathgeber H. (2006). Our iceberg is melting: Changing and succeeding under any conditions. New York: St. Martin's Press.

This book is an enjoyable fable that explores the elements necessary to implement organizational change. The fable follows Fred, a particularly observant penguin, who realizes his colony lives on a melting iceberg. Once the colony understands the need for change, several penguins with varying personalities and leadership styles rise to the challenge of finding a new home using the eight-step framework for change. Beginning with the need to create a sense of urgency and ending with the creation of a new culture, the lessons the penguins learn are relevant to hospitals as they create a culture of safety. While the fable teaches valuable lessons about the process of change, it also keeps the reader engaged with endearing penguin characters that can remind us of people in our own organization. In the end, Our Iceberg is Melting will provide those involved in patient safety and quality improvement with a framework to learn about the role of teamwork and communication in managing organizational change.

An Introduction to Patient Safety Principles for Rural Healthcare Providers and Governing Boards

DOWNLOAD


EXECUTE



Engineer a REPORTING Culture

MEDMARX - Medication Error Reporting System LINK
MEDMARX is an anonymous medication error reporting program that subscribing hospitals and health systems participate in as part of their ongoing quality improvement initiatives. Nationally, data from MEDMARX contributes to knowledge about the causes and prevention of medication errors. Over 870 hospitals and health systems have submitted more than 1.3 million medication error records to MEDMARX. Analyses of voluntary medication error reports from large patient safety databases, such as MEDMARX, can identify system sources of error and lead to the establishment of safe medication practices.
 
MEDMARX Data Entry - Workshop Slides (PDF)
 
DOWNLOAD
Using MEDMARX for Reporting and Benchmarking - Workshop Slides (PDF)
 
DOWNLOAD
Excel Quarterly Report Template for MEDMARX Data (Excel)
 
DOWNLOAD
Medication Safety Reporting Form (Powerpoint)
 
DOWNLOAD
Near-Miss Reporting Form (Word) DOWNLOAD
Use the Near-Miss Reporting Form to encourage reporting of Category A and Category B errors.
 

Engineer a JUST Culture

Unsafe Acts Algorithm (PDF) DOWNLOAD
Psychologist James Reason constructed this algorithm to help front-line managers determine the culpability or blameworthiness of a single person involved in an incident. The algorithm should be applied to each individual act that contributed to an incident or near- miss. The key questions across the top of the algorithm determine the intent of the individual. For more information on how to use this algorithm click here.
 
The Just Culture Community Website LINK

This website provides a guide to building an open, fair, and just culture, and a guide to the management of three distinct classes of behavior. By registering to become a community member you can gain access to online training and an interactive form of the unsafe acts algorithm.
 


Engineer a FLEXIBLE Culture

TeamSTEPPS Teamwork System LINK

Executing the TeamSTEPPS teamwork system should result in changing the knowledge, attitudes and performance of healthcare providers related to teamwork. Executing TeamSTEPPS requires an understanding of team structure and the skills to lead teams, monitor the situation, communicate effectively, provide mutual support to team members.

Executing leadership in the context of teamwork requires the following skills:
bullet Organize the team
bullet Articulate clear goals
bullet Make decisions through collective input of members
bullet Empower members to speak up and challenge, when appropriate
bullet Actively promote and facilitate good teamwork
bullet Skillful at conflict resolution

Executing situation monitoring requires actively scanning the behaviors and actions of those around you to assess elements of the situation or environment.

Executing mutual support is the essence of teamwork
bullet Protects team members from work overload situations that may reduce effectiveness and increase the risk of error
bullet Team members foster a climate in which it is expected that assistance will be actively sought and offered as a method for reducing the occurrence of error.

Executing effective communication requires that communication is
bullet Complete…all relevant information is communicated
bullet Clear…convey information that is plainly understood
bullet Brief…communicate the information in a concise manner
bullet Timely…
- Offer and request information in an appropriate timeframe
- Verify authenticity
- Validate or acknowledge information

 

Structured Communication - SBAR LINK

In flexible organizations that value reporting, authority patterns relax when safety information is exchanged because those with authority respect the knowledge of front-line workers. SBAR is a tool that structures communication (informal reporting) and ensures that healthcare providers exchange critical patient information in a manner that overcomes barriers to effective communication. These barriers include the traditional authority patterns in healthcare, gender, ethnicity, and differences in communication styles. By using SBAR, one provider systematically provides information about a Situation (what is happening) and the Background leading up to the situation, provides his/her Assessment of the problem, and his/her Recommendation to address the problem described in the situation. SBAR enables reporting information in a structured format that supports effective communication across authority gradients. As such, the SBAR technique is a practice that requires interaction between a reporting culture and a flexible culture.
 

Handoff Communications Tool - "I PASS THE BATON" LINK

Ineffective handoff of information can lead to delays in diagnosis, the wrong treatments, life-threatening adverse events, patient complaints, an increased cost and length of stay, and litigation. Patients are at particular risk for errors during transitions in care. Recognizing this risk, the Joint Commission has a specific National Patient Safety Goal 2E that addresses communication during hand offs and transitions in care: “Implement a standardized approach to “hand off” communications, including an opportunity to ask and respond to questions.Flexible organizations use structured communication tools to decrease the risk to patients during handoffs and transitions in care. During effective handoffs, information, authority, and responsibility are clearly transferred by including an opportunity to ask questions, clarify, and confirm information. The SBAR format is one tool to structure handoffs in care. The Department of Defense developed a tool to specifically transfer patient information, as well as responsibility and accountability for patient care. The mnemonic for this tool is “I PASS the BATON.”

Department of Defense Patient Safety Program. Healthcare Communications Toolkit to Improve Transitions in Care. (2005).  Retrieved December 28, 2007, from http://dodpatientsafety.usuhs.mil/files/Handoff_Toolkit.pdf 

I ntroduction—Introduce yourself and your role/job.
 

P atient—Confirm the patient’s name, identifiers, age, sex, location.

A ssessment—Provide your assessment of the patient’s chief complaint, vital signs, symptoms, and diagnosis.

S ituation—Describe the patient’s current status/circumstances, including code status, level of uncertainty, recent changes, response to treatment.

S afety concerns—Provide critical lab values/reports, socio-economic factors, allergies, alerts (e.g. falls, isolation).
 

THE
 

B ackground—Identify comorbidities, previous episodes, current medications, history.

A ctions—Describe actions that were taken or are required AND provide a brief rationale.

T iming—Explain the level of urgency, explicit timing, and prioritization of actions.

O wnership—Identify who is responsible for the next steps including patient/family responsibilities.

N ext—Confirm what will happen next. Anticipated changes? What is the plan?

 

Sample Disruptive Behavior Management Policy DOWNLOAD
Survey of Staff Relations to Increase Awareness of Disruptive Behavior DOWNLOAD

Engineer a LEARNING Culture

Root cause analysis (RCA) retrospectively makes sense of a single event (Word)

DOWNLOAD

Root cause analysis is a process for identifying the basic or causal factors that underlie variation in performance, including the occurrence or possible occurrence of a sentinel event. A root cause analysis focuses primarily on systems and processes, not individual performance. It progresses from special causes in clinical processes to common causes in organizational processes and identifies potential improvements in processes or systems that would tend to decrease the likelihood of such events in the future, or determines, after analysis that no such improvement opportunities exist.
 
The Joint Commission's testimony on the role of RCA  to reduce medical errors

LINK

Conducting individual RCA  in small rural hospitals (PDF)

DOWNLOAD

Sample RCA agenda for small rural hospitals (Word)

DOWNLOAD

Sample RCA  causal statement (Word)

DOWNLOAD

The Joint Commission's framework for a RCA  and action plan

LINK

VA National Center for Patient Safety RCA  tools

LINK

Aggregate RCA retrospectively makes sense of multiple similar events

 

Aggregate RCA is a process for identifying trends and system sources of error across groupings of similar events. The process requires multiple steps to analyze a process, select a focus for improvement, and design and evaluate interventions. Aggregate RCA efficiently uses the limited resources in small rural hospitals to identify chronic hazards within systems. These chronic hazards are the near-misses and nonharmful errors reported by front-line workers in direct contact with patients. Source: Using Aggregate Root Cause Analysis to Improve Patient Safety
 
Conducting aggregate RCA in small rural hospitals (PDF)

DOWNLOAD


Engineer INTERACTIONS

Safety Briefings (IHI Tool) LINK
Patient Safety Leadership WalkRounds™ LINK

EVALUATE



Engineering a REPORTING Culture

Implementing a Program of Patient Safety in Small Rural Hospitals: Findings and Trends in Medication Error Reporting from 25 Critical Access Hospitals (PDF) DOWNLOAD

This report summarizes the medication error reports voluntarily submitted to MEDMARX in calendar year 2005 by the 25 Critical Access Hospitals in our project.
 

AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture LINK
Survey items to assess a Reporting Culture
bullet When a mistake is made, but is caught and corrected before affecting the patient, how often is this reported?
bullet When a mistake is made, but has no potential to harm the patient, how often is this reported?
bullet When a mistake is made that could harm the patient, but does not, how often is this reported?
bullet In the past 12 months, how many event reports have you filled out and submitted?
 
Survey items to assess a Just Culture
bullet Staff feel like their mistakes are held against them.
bullet When an event is reported, it feels like the person is being written up, not the problem.
bullet Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file.
 
Survey items to assess a Flexible Culture
bullet People support one another in this department.
bullet When a lot of work needs to be done quickly, we work together as a team to get the work done.
bullet In this department, people treat each other with respect.
bullet When one area in this department gets really busy, others help out.
 
Survey items to assess a Learning Culture
bullet We are actively doing things to improve patient safety.
bullet Mistakes have led to positive changes here.
bullet After we make changes to improve patient safety, we evaluate their effectiveness.  
bullet We are given feedback about changes put into place based on event reports.  
 
AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture - Survey Resources LINK
AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture - Survey Service for small rural hospitals LINK
Explanation of rural adaptation......
 

Hit Counter

Back to the top.