|
|
ENGAGE AND EDUCATE |
|
|
|
Engineer a REPORTING Culture |
|
|
Reporting Systems
as the Foundation of Patient Safety Programs (Powerpoint) |
 |
Objectives …
 |
Explain the role
of voluntary reporting systems in a program of patient safety |
 |
Identify the
characteristics of successful reporting systems |
 |
Identify
information necessary for systematic data collection in a medication
error reporting program |
 |
Understand how
the
NCC MERP
Taxonomy of error severity provides a language to
describe errors in the context of a system
|
|
|
Process Map Template for Medication Administration
(Excel) |
 |
Creating a flowchart or process map makes your process or system visible and
ensures that everybody has the same mental model of the system.
A
process map will …
 |
Identify unexpected complexity and redundancy of steps |
 |
Compare and contrast the current process with the evidence-based process from
guidelines and identify priorities for change |
 |
Identify needed areas for further data collection and prioritization of change |
 |
Serve as a communication tool in training or a root cause analysis |
|
|
To Map or Not to Map (Powerpoint) |
 |
Objectives …
 |
List three benefits for documenting a process using a process map |
 |
Identify barriers and gaps in a
process |
 |
Determine evidence-based practices to improve the process to eliminate failures
|
 |
Describe three tools for
documenting processes
|
|
|
How to Develop a Process Map
(Word) |
 |
|
Process mapping allows you to identify productivity opportunities, best
practices, root causes of problems, create workflow consistency, and
determine who owns an action item within the process and who is
accountable for the process.
|
|
|
Engineer a Just Culture |
|
|
Patient Safety and the “Just Culture”: A Primer for Health Care Executives. Marx D. (2001)
|
|
|
Marx, D. (2001).
Patient Safety and the “Just Culture”: A Primer for Health Care
Executives. Prepared for Columbia University under a grant provided by
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
"To promote a culture in which we learn from our mistakes, organizations
must re-evaluate just how their disciplinary system fits into
the equation. Disciplining employees in response to honest mistakes does little to
improve overall system safety. Yet, mishaps accompanied by intoxication or malicious
behavior presents an obvious and valid objection to today’s call for blame-free error
reporting systems."
|
|
Principles of a Fair and Just Culture - Patient Safety Rounds Toolkit
|
 |
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Principles of a
Fair and Just Culture. Patient Safety Rounds Toolkit.
Example
of how one organization has operationalized "Just Culture".
|
|
The Just Culture Community Website |
 |
|
This website provides a
guide to building an open,
fair, and just culture, and a guide to the management of three distinct
classes of behavior. By registering to become a community member
you can gain access to online training and an interactive form of the
unsafe acts algorithm.
|
|
|
Engineer a FLEXIBLE Culture |
|
|
Joint Commission Website - Sentinel Event Statistics |
 |
|
For over a decade, communication has been the single
greatest root cause of sentinel events reported to the Joint Commission.
In 2006, leadership and procedural compliance were also among the top
four root causes of sentinel events. Communication, leadership, and
compliance with procedures reflect the knowledge, skills, and attitudes
required for healthcare providers to effectively function as teams.
|
|
TeamSTEPPS Overview |
 |
As Carolyn Clancy, MD, Director
of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality indicates,
“Communication failures and lack of teamwork are major contributing
factors to patient injury and harm. There is a growing body of evidence
from military, civilian, transportation, and healthcare settings that
confirms the fact that effective team skills can be developed.”
TeamSTEPPS™ is an evidence-based teamwork system aimed at optimizing
patient outcomes by improving communication and other teamwork skills
among health care professionals. It includes a comprehensive set of
ready-to-use materials and training curricula necessary to integrate
teamwork principles successfully into your health care system.
TeamSTEPPS™ was developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) in
collaboration with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ).
|
|
Managing Disruptive Behavior as a Foundation for Teamwork |
 |
|
Disruptive behavior is any inappropriate behavior, confrontation, or conflict, ranging from verbal abuse to physical or sexual harassment. Disruptive behavior causes strong psychological and emotional feelings, which can adversely affect patient care (Rosenstein & O’Daniel, 2008). On July 9, 2008, The Joint Commission issued a Sentinel Event Alert regarding disruptive behavior: and stated that, “Intimidating and disruptive behaviors can foster medical errors, contribute to poor patient satisfaction and preventable adverse outcomes, increase the cost of care, and cause qualified clinicians, administrators and managers to seek new positions in more professional environments. Safety and quality of patient care is dependent on teamwork, communication, and a collaborative work environment. To assure quality and to promote a culture of safety, health care organizations must address the problem of behaviors that threaten the performance of the health care team.”
http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_40.htm
To function as part of a team, individuals must feel valued and be treated with respect.
Alan Rosenstein, M.D., M.B.A., is Vice President and Medical Director, VHA West Coast. He is a nationally-recognized expert in the prevalence and management of disruptive behavior in healthcare. Michelle O’Daniel, M.H.A., M.S.G., is Director of Member Services at VHA. Dr. Rosenstein and Ms. O’Daniel have published extensively on the topic of disruptive behavior. Rosenstein and O’Daniel advocate a strategy to address disruptive behavior that includes: raising awareness through surveys, developing policies and procedures for reporting, and education. This education links disruptive behavior to adverse events and identifies structured teamwork and communication skills such as those in the TeamSTEPPS™ curriculum essential to managing disruptive behavior.
|
|
|
Engineer a LEARNING Culture |
|
|
Learning
disabilities can be fatal in organizations |
|
|
Being a learning organization does not mean that senior
leaders are eager to try each new idea that emerges from the literature,
a workshop, or a consultant. Being a learning organization means:
 |
formal and informal
safety reporting systems provide information about
safety systems |
 |
there is a just
and straightforward way to decide if an event warrants disciplinary
action |
 |
structured
communication in the context of teamwork ensures that an
organization is flexible—authority gradients are not a
barrier to effective communication |
 |
the will exists to
act—to execute and evaluate—the
changes indicated by safety reporting systems
|
 |
a learning
organization systematically makes sense of events that occur
to achieve the goals of eliminating risks and hazards to patient
safety and providing evidence-based reliable care
|
|
|
A simple fable helps learning organizations overcome resistance to
change |
 |
|
Kotter J, Rathgeber H.
(2006). Our iceberg is melting: Changing and succeeding under any
conditions. New York: St. Martin's Press.
This book is an enjoyable fable that explores the elements necessary to
implement organizational change. The fable follows Fred, a particularly
observant penguin, who realizes his colony lives on a melting iceberg.
Once the colony understands the need for change, several penguins with
varying personalities and leadership styles rise to the challenge of
finding a new home using the eight-step framework for change. Beginning
with the need to create a sense of urgency and ending with the creation
of a new culture, the lessons the penguins learn are relevant to
hospitals as they create a culture of safety. While the fable teaches
valuable lessons about the process of change, it also keeps the reader
engaged with endearing penguin characters that can remind us of people
in our own organization. In the end, Our Iceberg is Melting will
provide those involved in patient safety and quality improvement with a
framework to learn about the role of teamwork and communication in
managing organizational change.
|
 |
|
An Introduction to Patient Safety Principles for Rural
Healthcare Providers and Governing Boards |
 |
|
|
EXECUTE |
|
|
|
Engineer a REPORTING Culture |
|
|
MEDMARX
- Medication Error Reporting System |
 |
MEDMARX is an anonymous medication error reporting program that subscribing
hospitals and health systems participate in as part of their
ongoing quality improvement initiatives. Nationally, data from
MEDMARX contributes to knowledge about the causes and prevention
of medication errors. Over 870 hospitals and health systems have
submitted more than 1.3 million medication error records to
MEDMARX. Analyses of voluntary medication error reports from
large patient safety databases, such as MEDMARX, can identify
system sources of error and lead to the establishment of safe
medication practices.
|
MEDMARX Data Entry - Workshop Slides (PDF)
|
 |
Using MEDMARX for Reporting and Benchmarking -
Workshop Slides (PDF)
|
 |
Excel Quarterly Report Template for MEDMARX Data
(Excel)
|
 |
Medication Safety Reporting Form (Powerpoint)
|
 |
|
Near-Miss Reporting Form
(Word) |
 |
Use the Near-Miss
Reporting Form to encourage reporting of Category A and Category B
errors.
|
|
|
Engineer a JUST Culture |
|
|
Unsafe Acts Algorithm (PDF) |
 |
Psychologist James Reason constructed this algorithm to help front-line managers determine the culpability or blameworthiness of a single person involved in an incident. The algorithm should be applied to each individual act that contributed to an incident or near- miss. The key questions across the top of the algorithm determine the intent of the individual.
For more information on how to use this algorithm
click here.
|
|
The Just Culture Community Website |
 |
|
This website provides a
guide to building an open,
fair, and just culture, and a guide to the management of three distinct
classes of behavior. By registering to become a community member
you can gain access to online training and an interactive form of the
unsafe acts algorithm.
|
|
|
Engineer a FLEXIBLE Culture |
|
|
TeamSTEPPS Teamwork System |
 |
|
Executing the TeamSTEPPS teamwork system should result in
changing the knowledge, attitudes and performance of healthcare
providers related to teamwork. Executing TeamSTEPPS requires an
understanding of team structure and the skills to lead teams, monitor
the situation, communicate effectively, provide mutual support to team
members.
Executing leadership in the context of
teamwork requires the following skills:
 |
Organize the team
|
 |
Articulate clear goals
|
 |
Make decisions through collective input of members
|
 |
Empower members to speak up and challenge, when
appropriate |
 |
Actively promote and facilitate good teamwork
|
 |
Skillful at conflict resolution |
Executing situation monitoring requires
actively scanning the behaviors and actions of those around you to
assess elements of the situation or environment.
Executing mutual support is the essence of
teamwork
 |
Protects team members from work overload situations that
may reduce effectiveness and increase the risk of error
|
 |
Team members foster a climate in which it is expected that assistance will be actively sought and offered as a
method for reducing the occurrence of error. |
Executing effective communication requires
that communication is
 |
Complete…all relevant information is communicated |
 |
Clear…convey information that is plainly understood
|
 |
Brief…communicate the information in a concise manner
|
 |
Timely…
- Offer and request information in an appropriate timeframe
- Verify authenticity
- Validate or acknowledge information
|
|
|
Structured
Communication - SBAR |
 |
|
In flexible organizations that value reporting, authority
patterns relax when safety information is exchanged because those with
authority respect the knowledge of front-line workers. SBAR is a tool
that structures communication (informal reporting) and ensures that
healthcare providers exchange critical patient information in a manner
that overcomes barriers to effective communication. These barriers
include the traditional authority patterns in healthcare, gender,
ethnicity, and differences in communication styles. By using SBAR, one
provider systematically provides information about a Situation
(what is happening) and the Background
leading up to the situation, provides his/her Assessment
of the problem, and his/her Recommendation
to address the problem described in the situation.
SBAR enables reporting information in a structured format that supports
effective communication across authority gradients. As such, the SBAR
technique is a practice that requires interaction between a reporting
culture and a flexible culture.
|
|
Handoff Communications
Tool - "I PASS THE BATON" |
 |
|
Ineffective handoff of information can lead to delays in diagnosis, the
wrong treatments, life-threatening adverse events, patient complaints,
an increased cost and length of stay, and litigation.
Patients are at particular risk for errors
during transitions in care. Recognizing this risk, the Joint Commission
has a specific National Patient Safety Goal 2E that addresses
communication during hand offs and transitions in care: “Implement
a standardized approach to “hand off” communications, including an
opportunity to ask and respond to questions.”
Flexible organizations use structured communication tools to
decrease the risk to patients during handoffs and transitions in care.
During effective handoffs, information, authority, and responsibility
are clearly transferred by including an opportunity to ask questions,
clarify, and confirm information. The SBAR format is one tool to
structure handoffs in care. The Department of Defense developed a tool
to specifically transfer patient information, as well as responsibility
and accountability for patient care.
The mnemonic for this tool is “I PASS the BATON.”
Department of Defense Patient Safety Program. Healthcare
Communications Toolkit to Improve Transitions in Care. (2005).
Retrieved December 28, 2007, from
http://dodpatientsafety.usuhs.mil/files/Handoff_Toolkit.pdf
I ntroduction—Introduce yourself and your role/job.
P atient—Confirm
the patient’s name, identifiers, age, sex, location.
A ssessment—Provide your assessment of the patient’s chief complaint,
vital signs, symptoms, and diagnosis.
S ituation—Describe the patient’s current status/circumstances, including
code status, level of uncertainty, recent changes, response to
treatment.
S afety
concerns—Provide critical lab values/reports, socio-economic factors,
allergies, alerts (e.g. falls, isolation).
THE
B ackground—Identify
comorbidities, previous episodes, current medications, history.
A ctions—Describe
actions that were taken or are required AND provide a brief rationale.
T iming—Explain the
level of urgency, explicit timing, and prioritization of actions.
O wnership—Identify who
is responsible for the next steps including patient/family
responsibilities.
N ext—Confirm
what will happen next. Anticipated changes? What is the plan?
|
|
Sample Disruptive Behavior Management Policy |
 |
|
Survey of Staff Relations to Increase Awareness of Disruptive Behavior |
 |
|
|
Engineer a LEARNING Culture |
|
|
Root cause analysis (RCA) retrospectively makes sense of a single event
(Word) |
 |
Root cause analysis is
a process for identifying the basic or causal factors that underlie
variation in performance, including the occurrence or possible
occurrence of a sentinel event. A root cause analysis focuses primarily
on systems and processes, not individual performance. It progresses from
special causes in clinical processes to common causes in organizational
processes and identifies potential improvements in processes or systems
that would tend to decrease the likelihood of such events in the future,
or determines, after analysis that no such improvement opportunities
exist.
|
|
The Joint Commission's testimony on the role of
RCA
to
reduce medical errors |
 |
|
Conducting individual
RCA
in
small rural hospitals (PDF) |
 |
|
Sample RCA agenda for small rural hospitals (Word) |
 |
|
Sample
RCA causal
statement (Word) |
 |
|
The Joint Commission's framework for a
RCA
and
action plan |
 |
|
VA National Center for Patient Safety
RCA
tools |
 |
|
Aggregate RCA retrospectively makes sense of multiple similar events |
|
Aggregate RCA is a
process for identifying trends and system sources of error across
groupings of similar events. The process requires multiple steps to
analyze a process, select a focus for improvement, and design and
evaluate interventions. Aggregate RCA efficiently uses the limited
resources in small rural hospitals to identify chronic hazards within
systems. These chronic hazards are the near-misses and nonharmful errors
reported by front-line workers in direct contact with patients.
Source: Using Aggregate Root Cause Analysis to Improve Patient Safety
|
|
Conducting
aggregate RCA in small rural hospitals
(PDF) |
 |
|
|
Engineer INTERACTIONS |
|
|
Safety Briefings (IHI Tool) |
 |
|
Patient Safety Leadership WalkRounds™ |
 |
|
|
EVALUATE |
|
|
|
Engineering a REPORTING Culture |
|
|
Implementing a Program of Patient Safety in Small Rural Hospitals:
Findings and Trends in Medication Error Reporting from 25 Critical
Access Hospitals (PDF) |
 |
|
This
report summarizes the medication error reports voluntarily submitted to
MEDMARX in calendar year 2005 by the 25 Critical Access Hospitals in our
project.
|
|
AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture |
 |
Survey items to assess a Reporting Culture
 |
When a mistake is made, but is caught and corrected before
affecting the patient, how often is this reported? |
 |
When a mistake is made, but has no potential to harm the patient,
how often is this reported? |
 |
When a mistake is made that could harm the patient, but does not,
how often is this reported? |
 |
In the past 12
months, how many event reports have you filled out and
submitted? |
Survey items to assess a
Just Culture
 |
Staff feel like their mistakes are held
against them. |
 |
When an event is reported, it feels like the
person is being written up, not the problem. |
 |
Staff worry that mistakes they make are kept in their personnel file. |
Survey items to assess a
Flexible Culture
 |
People support one another in this department. |
 |
When a lot of work needs to be done quickly, we work together as a team to get the work done. |
 |
In this department, people treat each other with respect. |
 |
When one area in this department gets really busy, others help out.
|
Survey items to assess a
Learning Culture
 |
We are actively doing things to improve patient safety. |
 |
Mistakes have led to positive changes here. |
 |
After we make changes to improve patient safety, we evaluate their effectiveness.
|
 |
We are given feedback about changes put into place based on event reports.
|
|
|
AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture -
Survey Resources |
 |
|
AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture -
Survey Service for small rural hospitals |
 |
Explanation of rural
adaptation...... |