UNMC_Acronym_Vert_sm_4c
University of Nebraska Medical Center

The Pandemic Was a Time Machine

NYT

Recently I came across perhaps the most mind-bending chart about the pandemic I’d seen over three-plus years. Originally published two years ago in The British Medical Journal, it shows how Covid affected age-standardized mortality in England and Wales — a statistic that controls for demographic change in measuring death rates, so that a country doesn’t look as if it’s getting sicker just because it’s getting older.

Two things about the chart jumped out. First, at the onset of the pandemic in 2020, there was a dramatic spike in age-standardized mortality. For men, the increase was 14.6 percent, according to the Office for National Statistics; for women, 11.9 percent.

Second, though: In historical context, that jump did not appear all that large. It only brought age-standardized mortality to the level it had been in the year 2008, meaning that, correcting for age, the English and the Welsh were no more likely to die in 2020, in the midst of a once-in-a-lifetime global health crisis, than they were 12 years before, in what did not seem like a particularly deadly year at the time.

Novelty matters, and the sudden arrival of a masterfully infectious and deadly virus was justifiably alarming and galvanizing, adding a large amount of death on top of a mortality baseline we’d all wish was much lower. But progress in improving that baseline matters, too. And from that vantage, the mortality setbacks of 2020 looked smaller than the apparent gains of the previous 20 years — and not just in England and Wales. Across much of Western Europe and North America, even the horrible pandemic peaks only brought age-standardized death rates as high as they were in normal-seeming years around the turn of the millennium.

continue reading

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.